Email Print

Virginia Senate Election: New Revelations and Mis-steps Keep Everyone Watching

The Virginia senate election continues to tighten as the final debate approaches on October 9.  Continued mis-steps, personal revelations and cross party finger pointing make the election between incumbent George Allen and challenger Jim Webb a close - and interesting - race to follow.  

The public revelation last Monday of Senator Allen's Jewish heritage has national eyes closely watching this increasingly interesting and tightly contested race.  While recent reports show Allen leading his challenger former Secretary of the Navy Jim Webb 12 to 1 in fund raising, the election grows increasingly close.  Ken Rudin, National Public Radio's (NPR) host of "Political Junkie," noted on his segment on Saturday September 23 that Virginia is decidedly a tidewater state, where President Bush the thinnest of electoral majorities in 2004 at 50.4%.  Meanwhile, former Democratic Vice Presidential Candidate John Edwards campaigned in Virginia for Webb.  This weekend, Allen will be making an appearance at the "2006 Values Voter Summit" in Washington, D.C. sponsored by the Family Research Council.  For information on this, and other contested races in 2006, NPR's interactive map of campaign 2006 provides an excellent summary of candidates, issues and elections in each state, highlighting which party's seat is up election.  

< We The People/Wisconsin - A "debate" that Worked | Absent Candidates, are Debates Debates? >
 Display:
It can't help Alen that the Weekly Standard, behind a most unflattering cover, rips Allen in their latest issue.

Be the debater you want to see.

by Ross Smith on 09/24/2006 01:56:41 PM EST

The after life of the latest Allen Webb Senate race illustrate how debates can be powerful, not so much in moving viewer who watch the debate but by providing grist for testing the candidate's narrative and outstanding issues percolating in campaigns.  Allen's trouble with "truth telling" and residual racism was given legs via his answers to post debate commentary on his "Jewish" heritage. Aspects of the debates, while not noteworthy in themselves, have import when considered through the lens of overarching campaign/media themes.  

Certainly Gore's 2000 exaggeration in Boston and changing persona in Winston-Salem and St. Louis "confirmed" the prevailing narrative materially impacting the election.  Bush's slow witted sincerity also confirmed.  Even as commentators said the debate did not matter much, they in fact, completed the distinctions playing in the larger election.

Allen is learning that lesson.

  • Allan Louden, Wake Forest University
  • Winston-Salem, NC
  • by Allan Louden on 09/25/2006 10:37:13 PM EST