Email Print

On Chuck Norris, Mike Huckabee, and Voter Apathy

In the greatly over-extended lead up to the 2008 Presidential elections, one man is singlehandedly boosting underdog Mike Huckabee's chances while prooving exactly how irrelevant the entire process up until now has been.

He also has a wicked roundhouse kick.

Last week I declared that there were four relevant candidates at the Dearborn debate: Guliani, Romney, Thompson, and McCain. I should add Mike Huckabee to that list. Lately he's been surging in the polls and has experienced a jump in fundraising. Not coincidentally, two weeks ago in a WorldNetDaily article, Chuck Norris endorsed Mike Huckabee.

Since then Huckabee has jumped from second tier to a dark horse contender. A recent poll in Iowa shows him tied for second place with Rudi Guliani, ahead of John McCain and Fred Thompson. Nationally, todays Rasmussen poll places him tied for fourth with John McCain with 12%. Similarly, his campain announced that in the five days after the endorsement went public, they recieved about $550,000 in contributions, accounting for more than half the amount that they recieved in October total.

Think about it. Chuck Norris, an actor who became famous for his martial prowless before becoming an internet meme (Ex: Chuck Norris is currently suing NBC, claiming that 'Law & Order' are the names of his left and right legs.), is exerting a fairly dramatic influence over the Republican nomination process.

If ever there was a case to be made for voter apathy, there it is.

If a candidate can surge like this based off of the nomination of an actor/internet joke, what does that tell you about what people think about the candidates? That tells me a surprising amount of voters have either not formed a strong opinion on the candidates yet, or they just haven't started caring. Now, keeping that in mind, think of how long this process has been going on this year. The first Republican candidates debate was back on May 3rd. Now, almost half a year later, following wall-to-wall coverage in this 24-hour news world we live in, following debate after debate, people just don't seem to care that much.

I read in the Washington Post there's going to be another Democratic debate tonight. It's the first one in more than a month, and nobody but the diehard politics and debate junkies care.

< Striaght Ticket Voting, or, How Dumb Are We? | old school obama debates >
 Display:
speaking of mingling actors with politics...

Stephen Colbert running for president. Are you kidding me? Are you JOKING?

I support Terrell's in-class rant that if Americans put him in office, we WILL be the laughing-stock of the world, even MORE SO than we are already, and we should all move to Canada.

It will never happen, though. Colbert? I'd like to think we know better.

by Gwen Wisnefske on 10/30/2007 09:39:12 PM EST

Like many Americans who make up that growing class of "disillusioned" voters, I watched the latest "town hall"-style TV debate between Barack Obama and John McCain with my expectations held firmly in check. No matter how many direct questions you ask a politician, regardless of their party affiliation, the answers you receive will resemble generalized sound bites. The New York Times described it as "90 minutes of forced cordiality," and I must agree. While the exchange was "mercifully free" of personal attacks (according to the Boston Globe), the result was that it was free of much of the tension that makes for compelling television. McCain continued to trumpet experience, his "stay the course" stance on Iraq (seriously, he could have been G.H. Bush's understudy) and his oil drilling policies. Obama continued to criticize Republican policies that he claims have led America into its current recession. If all were based upon the candidates' performance here, we'd have no idea exactly how either of them would work to avert pending economic catastrophe. A coherent economic proposal is what America needs. Obama's stance on "predatory lending" - effectively sanctioning payday advance lenders - is not a coherent solution to the real economic problems we face. That's just a juicy steak to feed the banking and credit union dogs.

Post Courtesy of Personal Money Store
Professional Blogging Team
Feed Back:  1-866-641-3406
Home: http://personalmoneystore.c om/NoFaxPaydayLoans.html
Blog: http://personalmoneystore.c om/moneyblog/

by PaydayLoanAdvocate on 10/13/2008 06:53:21 AM EST