Email Print

SNL Addendum - More Satire Promised - Humor News Coverage Continues

Saturday Night Live and the Cleveland presidential debatehave been driven from the news as the campaign's engage in another debate of sorts--dueling ads about 3 AM phone calls to the White House.

After tonight's SNL show, however, the fusion of comedy and politics may rejoin the March 4th calculus. As the Washington Times reports "should this week's sketches have an impact on the presidential race, Mr. Michaels couldn't be happier." (The possibilities are discussed in a prior post).

Who will be watching? Admittedly speculative on my part, the SNL's audience is younger, more upscale, informed; an audience that is Obama's demographic. But then again, the show emanates from the NY Senator's main base. Regardless, SNL's anticipated debate skit will aim at neutrality. Its subsequent use, however, may not be neutral.

Guessing what will be shown and how it will spin is obviously idle - by tomorrow we'll know. Thinking about the composition of the SNL audience however reminds me of another quality of comedy and politics, that is: for humor to work it requires familiarity with politics.

In the Washington Times piece impressionist Jim Morris observes:

. . . [G]reat political sketches demand an informed public. That's exactly what "Saturday Night Live" has.

"You're relying on the viewers to get the references. Political humor has to play to a somewhat educated audience," Mr. Morris says. "In this political season, everyone seems to be up to speed on what's going on."

Other Comedy Notes below fold:

Clinton's debate comment received notice in such outlets as TheShowbuzz.com and Politico.

And the injection of SNL into the Cleveland debate is still driving coverage as with the New York Times "favoritism" exposition on Saturday.

Time Magazine's TV critic James Poniewozik argues these comic asides matter.

Yeah, I know, this is all a sideshow, it's has nothing to do with the issues, it's pop-culture noise that doesn't matter. Except that it does. Viral-video and comedian surrogates can make points that are too edgy to put in the candidate's own mouth; they attract free media coverage; they can capture the emotion and arguments of a campaign more viscerally than a stump speech; and as much as people may say that they don't care about celebrity endorsements, they at least convey an intangible feel of excitement, the sense that people are moved enough by a candidate to create. Whatever it is they offer--buzz, cool, psychological momentum--Clinton needed it, so it was unsurprising, if a little bizarre, to see her spokespeople working overtime to inject SNL into their talking points Monday morning.

Other comedy outlets are also players. Jon Stewart's Daily Show did a full riff on the Ohio match-up - Last Tango in Cleveland.

Or check out news shows covering the merger of satire, media, and campaigns via debate as with MSNBC coverage of on Dan Abrams.

< "Give Him a Pillow" - More Twists and Turns with S.N.L. and Debates | Saturday Night Live back in the Mix >
 Display: