Email Print

Host Loses Debate

There really is no good answer to the question posed by Cleveland's "muckraker" Roldo Bartimole:

Cleveland State University, a college of working class and middle class students, had to raise $300,000 to help put on the Democratic debate last week at the Wolstein Center.

Why?

Debate sponsors NBC-TV, its affiliate here WKYC, and its cable network MSNBC are all profit making entities. They all enjoy government-anointed, semi-monopolies using the public air waves. They are being fed by millions and millions of dollars of election advertising. Yet CSU had to go take $300,000 out of this community to host the event. I don't understand why the profit-makers didn't pay their own way.

The Cleveland debate drew 7.78 million voters, a historic best for MSNBC, according to Nielsen Media Research.

So shouldn't NBC pay CSU, rather than the other way around?

Not much of a debate at all here. Cleveland State might muster the argument that they benefit from the prestige of having hosted. They had better be able to prove that $300,000 could not have earned a better return had it been spent on other forms of recruiting or fundraising.

We know MSNBC got a huge return on their investment.

< Debate Molehill Grows into Mountain | Debates in Pennsylvania? Lincoln/Douglas Revisited. >
 Display: